Ombudsman October 31 2008

Top of Form 13 October 31 2008 Ontario Ombudsman To: Ms Did Notcatchyourname Re: Government organized crime Re: Your Phone call October 31 2008 about 3 PM Ms Did It is beyond me what you were attempting to accomplish by your phone call yesterday, but assuredly it had nothing to do with the wellbeing of an Ontario Canadian citizen. Taxpayers are of the belief that the entire government system federal and provincial is financed to provided the necessities of a sane moral Canadian society consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. We are simply a group of diverse people from coast to coast whereas I was born in Ontario and have lived here ever since. The majority of us people work in the private sector and many opt for the government services but we are all equal before and under the law where we, out here in the real world carry the economy and they in the garbage sector have no doubt as to what is expected of them as our garbage is picked up like clock work each week after we sort it out at home and put it out so they can drop it off where ever it goes to be dealt with, recycling where practical Amongst us humans are garbage that we expect the legal system personnel to structure a system that works as competently where such a system has the opportunity to lessen the pick ups to twice a week, then once a month and like that so to speak as human garbage are not a necessity of society as containers, boxes, papers, bottles, wrappers… and such are at this time. Humans have many things in common where the sane of moral thought and reason understand the needs, dislikes, pleasures, sorrows, what harms and what does not. Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC born to poverty and rose to dine with kings left the hierarchy to teach the people what he had come to know and told us in the simplest terms that is known as the Golden Rule. “Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself” It could not be simpler to understand and obey and just as simple to recognize who is in non compliance. The thing about the Golden Rule is that everyone must subscribe to it or they that do are at a humongous disadvantage, so Confucius also gave us the hammer. “Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness” 1 That is a concept that has never occurred Since May 31 2006 I have swamped your office with e-mails requesting you deal with the issues I presented you and your phone call was the 3 or 4th I have had from your office. It is painfully obvious that your office is incompetent to deal with the most serious issues I originally presented you people where I have compiled our correspondence in a f On June 30 2005 I was an ordinary 63 year old taxpayer who had come to realize I had been defrauded by my former tenant during an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing that I had applied to evict my former basement tenant for arrears in rent and for refusing to vacant my premises on May 31 2005 as he had signed an agreement to do so. This is detailed in a 2 part Sun EditorOctober8 2006 documented that provides the irrefutable evidence It is so damn simple in theory and after all it is the law, the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution. The Constitution Act, 982 Part, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability, dominance Democracy: Social equality, equality, egalitarianism.....Egalitarianism: Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality Justice: Fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even-handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity                                                                                                                                The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia)                                                                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law   The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process. The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy. According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.   The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"    The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.   (103) Interpretation  (f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit  as well as in the letter.   Clearly the Golden Rule is "The Spirit of the Law" consistent with democracy, justice, principles, and the rule of law and any sane person of moral thought and reason could not possibly find the Golden Rule any fairer or simpler to comprehend where credence must be to that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind where all persons in matters of law are presumed sane and human who should have no misunderstanding as to what is receptive and nonreceptive to each other.   Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms   1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.   2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.   7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.   15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 2     24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.   31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority. 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.   52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.                                                        Consistency   To meet the terms of the "Letter of the Law" consistency is mandatory where  "The Letter of the Law" clearly recognizes the supremacy of God "The Spirit of the Law" has priority over "The Letter of the Law" where there is perceived to be ambiguity where as to maintain consistency "The Spirit of the Law" must prevail throughout and to maintain certainty of justice and equal protection and benefits of the law the personnel involved in the legal system namely the members of the Law Societies, government and private sector must be competent, responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to the support of ever individual's guaranteed Charter rights of protection and benefits.   It is irrelevant whether or not God exists or whether or not one believes he exists, and obviously it does not matter what one believes  CONSISTENCY in "The Spirit of the Law" must be CONSISTENTLY maintained.  Police Services Act                                       R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15 PoliceServicesAct.doc                                                                     Declaration of principles   1.  Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:            1.    The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve.            4.    The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs. Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception Jesus who new well of the aspirations attribute to God summarized with the Golden Rule paraphrasing Confucius “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” 3 The preceding 3 pages define “The Spirit of the Law” that all Ontario laws must be consistent. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. Every individual is responsible to competent and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to comply with “The Spirit of the Law” The legal system is financed to administer and enforce the laws consistent with the constitution with priority to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits Bottom Line The Police must pick up the human garbage and take it back to where ever it goes to be dealt with, recycling where practical. Consistency is Prerequisite Personnel must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to eradicating immoral inclination nipping it in the bud with due diligence to the application of punishment attentive to deterrence being the only viable means of present knowledge to guarantee every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit. “Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness” The governments are charged with the responsibility to administer and enforce laws consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General “ published on the Ontario web site state the Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council and the office has a constitutional and traditional responsibility beyond that of a political minister. He is the “guardian of the public interest” The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake. This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights. To be human is to err On the presumption the Attorney General is of “The Spirit of the Law” and with honourable intent ensures all provincial laws are enacted in “The Spirit of the Law” it is possible that in application it is determined that it does not meet the prerequisite standard of “The Spirit of the Law” it is the responsibility of the person applying the law to ensure it is in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit whereas it is the victim who is to be served by the law and few victims if the amoral is not punished and recycled to morality. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. Every effort must be to the certainty of CONSISTENCY of all laws with the Constitution as the consequences can be disastrous benefiting the criminal element further depriving the victim and holding the legal system in disrepute. “The Letter of the Law” is subordinate to “The Spirit of the Law” The Letter of the Law cedes to the supremacy of God A person who knowingly administers and enforces a law inconsistent with “The spirit of the Law” does so without authority and is liable for injury incurred. The legal system must be so constructed as to extend every effort and benefit to any person who becomes victim in recompense of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit whereas they must be extended every courtesy of the courts without charge as they are not onlt guaranteed the right under s. 24 (1) but they are doing a public service by bringing the amoral and criminal element before the courts to be dealt with in a manner conducive to the safety and well being of every individual as guaranteed of equal protection and benefit where there is a distinct separation of Charter rights where every individual is presumed innocent unless there is reasonable evidence to suggest otherwise. O the production of such reasonable evidence to personnel actively engaged in the legal system is mandatory that they make every effort to determine and present the truth in continuity to conclusion and legitimate resolve in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” in service of the moral society that financed them to which they are bound upon acceptance of said benefits. “The Spirit of the Law” is the law whereas “The Letter of the Law” must be consistent, read and interpreted in “The Spirit” and where ambiguity or inconsistency is observed must be duly noted and entered into a defined diligent plan to immediately circulate the delinquent law to all persons active in the legal system with the intent to amend as soon as practicable such as quarter annually. It must be determined if the delinquent law was made in error of good spirit or deliberately intended for nefarious purpose. Any person who fails to cooperate to the amendment consistent with the Constitution will be held liable by every person who suffers injury as a result without benefit of government support having acted without legal authority. It is the LAW and every individual carrying on business on behalf of the government who are financed to administer and enforce the law on behalf of the wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed is responsible and accountable to do so in “The Spirit of the Law” that authorized them to do so. A little learning is a dangerous thing; Drink deep and taste not the Pierian spring; Alexander Pope 1688 - 1744 There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain; And drinking largely sobers us again “The Spirit of the Law” is the authority and the persons administering and enforcing it are mere servants to carry out its will and are obliged to abide by it subject to it equally as are all citizens of Canada. We are all vulnerable to amoral persuasion and all amoral persuasion must be dealt with consistently with the best antidote available and viable which I reiterate is due punishment due the crime attentive to deterrence in support of every individual’s guaranteed equal Charter rights. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority. 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. Attorney General “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” There are many inconsistencies with the Constitution as it makes no mention of the Charter and the fact it is published on the Ontario web site today highly suggests nefarious intent by government members of the Law Society of Upper Canada of which the Attorney General is a member and administers the Law Society Act where he is not accountable to reprimands by the Society. Being the “guardian of the public interest” and the advisor of all government departments and agencies is responsible to ensure they are all operating consistent in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” and obviously himself where every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits are dependent on his adeptness to competent responsible and irreproachable administration and enforcement of “The Spirit of the Law”. The entire legal system has been structured and administered under the guidance of the office of the Attorney General which is not only inconsistent with the Constitution, The Spirit of the Law”, but is precisely adverse self-evident. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances. Clearly in the Attorney General’s esteemed position he is responsible to ensure the legal system is adept to the above provisions. There is only one way these terms can be met consistent with “The Spirit of the Law” and that is the court system must be designed efficiently and effectively tending to all matters that need to be dealt with in “The Spirit of the Law” free to every individual who becomes victim. Reasonable evidence attesting to the fact is the price of admittance and it is just as simple as that. However, that is not “How it is” admitted by Attorney General Chris Bentley and prominent judges in the July 26 2008 Saturday Toronto Star addressing the shortage of funds in the Legal Aid system where they give us words suggesting it is just a serious problem and they are looking into it. This serious problem inconsistent with democracy has existed since 1967 when the Legal Aid Act was introduced by the members of the Law Society who were obviously only interested in setting funds aside for them to ransack at will, with democratic rights not considered. With the 1982 enactment of the Constitution and the introduction of Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms every individual’s democratic rights were guaranteed along with their Charter rights, but under the guidance of the Attorney General and who ever pulls his strings they simply carried on their traditional unscrupulous ways absolutely adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. The article in the Star states it costs $60,000 for a three day Civil Suit unaffordable to the majority of the Middle Class, and yet they contribute to the Legal Aid system funding the amoral and criminal elements defence being absolutely adverse to “The Sprit of the Law” intended to eradicate immoral inclination in support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. So by charging exorbitant fees ransacking the taxpayer they obstruct access to the courts by the majority of the Middle Class clearly being obstruction of justice over and over again. The ramifications are horrendous providing the affluent humongous advantage over the people of the Lower Tier. This of course is a combined effort of all members of the Law Societies and Bar Associations taking advantage of their trusted positions to literally ransack society in every which way they can with cooperation of the politicians and their affluent and influential friends scratching each others backs to satiate their insatiable lust for wealth and power and of course the Government and their corporate friends caused the latest economical disaster driving more people into poverty as they direct $40 billion dollars to the oil industry where on the news today I heard one U.S. company recorded $14 billion profit in the period from July to September. The rich continue to get richer and the poor continue to get poorer attested to by Statistics Canada. All of reality attests to their nefarious bent as charlatans specifically trained specialists of deceit and prevarication for the express purpose of taking advantage of the moral majority. There is no end to the number of offenses they are guilty of under the Constitution which includes treason and for every person who jumped off a bridge in hopelessness and despair there are that many charges of first degree murder predictable under their deliberate defiance of the law that is financed by the people to prevent such atrocities. This government organized crime is endemic world wide and just impossible to calculate how much they have stolen from the people in financial and personal wellbeing. This is all commonly known just not focussed on but it is now as I reassign the responsibility to the Ombudsman and Ms Did to study the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and affiliate sites which I have been providing them for 2 ½ years now. Ontario Ombudsman What We Do The Ombudsman investigates complaints about services provided by the government of Ontario and its organizations. He also conducts systemic investigations on important issues about government services, which can affect large numbers of people. Under the Ombudsman Act, individuals as well as government officials and staff working in government organizations are required to co-operate with the Ombudsman and provide information during an investigation. Many cases brought to the Ombudsman are resolved informally through contact with government ministries and organizations. When the Ombudsman identifies a problem in how the government has treated an individual, he can report on it and make recommendations to correct the problem for that person. He can also make recommendations to change government policies and practices to prevent similar problems from occurring in the future and to improve the system for others. The Ombudsman’s high-profile Special Ombudsman Response Team (SORT) cases have resulted in improved government services for citizens across Ontario, including reforms to the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation and Legal Aid Ontario. The province’s screening of newborn babies for inherited diseases has been expanded, compensation for victims of crime was improved, and parents seeking residential care for special needs children are no longer forced to give up custody to children’s aid societies. Ms Did The ultimate purpose of this initiative is to expose the government organized crime to the people that requires your cooperation and of course Andre Marin who has the above authority. I cannot over emphasize the seriousness of the issues involved here and if you at any time feel you are incompetent to deal with them it is imperative you turn the investigation over to someone who is competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Carter rights of equal protection and benefit. It was my intention by the time you read to this point that you would have a reasonable understanding of the Constitution and the necessity of Ontario laws to be consistent with the Constitution or they are of no force or effect as to their inconsistency. For example you were telling me on the phone the other day how you do things there, which I am quite aware of and I was trying to explain to you how it should be done and you can save your efforts for the people attesting to how you do things, why and who. taught you …and like that. I want you to think with sane, moral thought and reason because we are dealing with the supreme law of Should you accept this mission Primary Target Former Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon. John Gerretsen Who instructed or charge Obstruction of Justice s.206 (1) T.P. Act Obstruction of Justice Criminal Code (Lawyer File # 3) Welcome to the Ombudsman of Ontario Website It is my pleasure to welcome you to our newly enhanced, more user-friendly Ombudsman of Ontario website. We’ve made it easier to file a complaint online and have included a “Hot Topics” section to keep you informed on the latest issues concerning our office. So whether you are filing a complaint or want to know more about the Ombudsman of Ontario, I invite you to spend time on our site exploring the information available at your fingertips. The Ombudsman is all about accountability and transparency, so please let us know how we’re doing. Your ideas are always welcome: info@ombudsman.on.ca.André Marin,Ombudsman of Ontario What's New September 30, 2008  Special Investigations Unit must dispel “toothless tiger” image: Ombudsman investigation finds culture of complacency at SIU Ontario Ombudsman André Marin’s latest special report calls for new legislation to help strengthen the province’s Special Investigations Unit (SIU), as well as sweeping internal changes to dispel “conspiracy theories” and public perceptions that the SIU has a pro-police bias.Learn More July 16, 2008  Ombudsman to investigate monitoring of long-term care facilities Ontario Ombudsman André Marin today announced he will conduct a full systemic investigation into the province’s monitoring of long-term care facilities – and its effectiveness in ensuring nursing homes meet government standards. About Us The Ombudsman of Ontario is an Officer of the Provincial Legislature who is independent of government and political parties. The Ombudsman’s job is to ensure government accountability through effective oversight of the administration of government services. The Ombudsman is appointed for a five-year renewable term and his powers and authorities are contained in legislation under the Ombudsman Act. Canada here, which Ontario laws must be consistent with. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.   Just set your laws, routines, habits, procedures, customs, mandate….whatever aside and revert to the common sense you use when you are out in the real world mingling with the people of the Lower Tier. After all, it is the safety and well being of all the people you people in the employ of the government in the legal sector financed by the people are all about, well at least that is what we are led to believe and your response will be on candid camera, I am not going to make this complicated for you and plain old common sense will serve you well Your purpose is not to prove the entire government is organized crime personified because they have already done that themselves as reality attests and when the evidence is presented to the public how would they debate it with words when their actions have betrayed them? Will they aver they intentionally embedded loopholes in the Constitution that provided them authority to disregard “The Spirit of the Law” and say to hell with the people? Well this will come to pass just as they will be interested to see how you handle their safety and wellbeing because this is not just about me, just one victim who has experienced the governments true character. All I want you to do in this exercise is deal with the issues that occurred at the beginning of my more than three year trek for justice consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. As you people have been provided the evidence all along and not dealt with it yet to this point as you explained to me on the phone you considered the issues closed and never bothered responding to further evidence and commentary of occurrences along my route to justice. Yoy were actually calling to talk about the latest e-mail you had received from me and I presume that was the one dated October 29 2008 regarding the Democracy Watch document. You explained it was rather general and needed to focus in on something or someone but the fact is if you had of been keeping up to speed you would have known precisely what it is all about and the evidence published on my sites will attest to that and everything I state. Telephone conversations are inane to purpose, hearsay as I told the last person from your office when she phoned out of the blue after not hearing from you people for quite a while to inform me that the Ombudsman was continuing the review of the evidence I had sent them and I have not heard from her since. This is contrary to what you told me that the issue was closed but I never received anything to confirm that. However when she called me I told her to hang up and e-mail me what she said and she did. That is what you call reliable evidence even if the person who wrote it isn’t reliable for it all proves something just waiting for the necessity or desire to do so. That e-mail will be found in the Ombudsman document along with other correspondence received from your office, which is considered hard evidence but just ignore it for now because you government people tend to make every effort to agree with fellow personnel and lose site of the primary objective to study the evidence and report the truth whatever that may be. I mean to say we people financed you to protect us not to protect yourselves while you ransack us. It would be prudent for me to mention that all the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and affiliate sites referenced thereon has been provided to a prodigious number of prominent Government personnel, police, media, Church, Federal Law Society, Bar Associations across Canada and so on requesting they deal with the issues and in case they misplaced the evidence like the City of Toronto did in another matter I published it all on the web and notified all the aforementioned government personnel of the web addresses where the evidence could be found. So it is important to understand that we are all referring to the same evidence, which is particularly interesting when you look at the responses I have received from government personnel who purportedly studied the evidence to competent coherence. This is not one of your normal cases where you can manipulate the outcome with the evidence not available to the public because this is for real where actions trump any number of words. Before I push ahead with the relatively small job I am requesting of you at this time I would like you to read the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada compiled document to get an understanding of these people. Perhaps Ms. Did you are one of these people which provides us all another good opportunity to observe your way of thinking. I remind you “The Spirit of the Law” is what we are expecting to radiate from you. Links to the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada are provided on the following web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force But for your convenience I have provided links here and I do not want you to go looking there yet because I want to feed you the evidence in a semblance to order that I believe you will best understand what I am attempting to convey to you. http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part1LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc http://charter-democracy-force.googlegroups.com/web/Part2LawSocietyofUpperCanada.doc In the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document they adamantly state or imply their members are not required to give a damn about every individuals guaranteed Charter rights as they are only obliged to advance the interests of their client. Money of course has the advantage. They go further to state that evidence is irrelevant when it is against their members. Quite compelling evidence of a corrupt government considering they hold every position of authority in the legal system and the office of the Attorney General is a member and administers the Law Society Act but is not accountable to the law Society. Considering he is the chief law officer of the Executive Council and advises all government departments and agencies and is the “guardian of the public interest” and I provided him a copy of the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document requesting he deal with this but refused to I would have to say it is very convincing evidence he does not give a damn about the public interest. So before we get into the simple matter I am requesting of you at this time I ask you to read that 2 part document to coherency and then come back and review these first 10 ½ pages so that you have it all comfortably placed in the back of your mind. Democracy is coming Perhaps a little music Democracy.m3u Okay take a break and the Catch Up with me on page 13 where I will assign you your task. According to the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” the office of the Attorney General advises the personnel in the following boxes and to make it simple for you just deal with the issue blocked in red with the intent to find out who instructed them to commit these serious offenses. These people are also guilty of conspiracy against me in positions of public trust and defiance of the Constitution and refusal to support every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit. Don Wilson, BioSafe is still active today as a person called me a month or so ago looking for him because he bounced a cheque. Click on http://groups.google.com/group/cdf--public-alert---bio-safe---don-wilson---fraud Premier of Ontario Dalton McGuinty Office of the Attorney General Chris Bentley Former AG Michael Bryant (Lawyer File # 7) Cabinet Ministers Legislature ORHT Rick Hennesey Who instructed or charge Obstruction of Landlord s.206 (1) Tenant Protection Act, 1997 Obstruction of Justice Criminal Code (Lawyer File # 1) Investigations and Enforcement Unit Dave Grech Who instructed or charge Obstruction of Landlord s.206 (1) Tenant Protection Act, 1997 Obstruction of Justice Criminal Code (Lawyer File # 2) Ontario Attorney General (Lawyer File # 7) Includes a copy of the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” He is ultimately responsible as “guardian of the public interest” He plays a major role in assigning authorities and mandates, which are evidence of his failure to diligently protect every individual as guaranteed. He has refused to deal with these issues as well as all other issues published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name Ontario Ombudsman The evidence on the web sites clearly shows all government departments, agencies and police have refused to deal with the issues. Janet Ortved told me your office is considered the last resort and you are limited in authority by your mandate, which is self-evident the system is not structured to support every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, therefore NOT CONSISTENT with the Constitution Ms Did felt I should contact my MPP however that was done long ago (Lawyer File # 5) but Julia Munro MPP refuses to help. Correspondence with her and other Ontario government departments and agencies can be found at http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society- So no need to direct me anywhere else as I have been there done that. Do not inform me that the time limit has run out to deal with these issues, because the entire stystem sent me around in circles refusing to deal with the issues immediately, competently, responsibly with fortitude and conviction to evey indivuduals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit. The system must be restructured to legitimate purpose consistent with the Constitution that was enacted in 1982 and 26 years have passed certainly time enough to get the job done whereas by law it should have been restructed and ready to go the moment of the enactment. That is what this is all about and any law that is inconsistent with a competent responsible irreproachable legal sytem consistent with the Constitution is of ne force or effect and such a law is evidence of deliberate intent to defy our Charter rights. There is no time limitation on our rights and in fact they are retroactive to the date of the 1982 enactment. There can be no technical reason that can obstruct our charter rights. No manipulation or orchestrations by the conspirators to end these initiatives for a legitimate government with competent responsible irreproachable personnel to ensure all government personnel are competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit. Since the Ombudsman is the last resort then ultimately he has the authority of the Constitution to commence or cause to commence proceedings to the resolve. But to make it simple at this moment begin the initiative to finally clean up the government by commencing or causing to commence proceedings against former Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon. John Gerretsen. *************************************************************************************************************** To stay focussed on Hon. John Gerretsen at this time go to http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force and scroll near half way down the page to a link to document Mad Sad mostly Glad…Why? Study the evidence beginning with that document down until you come to Lawyer file # 7 and stop without opening it. It is imperative that you know that the crimes committed at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal were in fact committed by my former tenant Don Wilson President of Bio Safe on June 30 2005 and the 2 part Sun Editor October 8 2006 document irrefutably proves that. This was done in a public building financed by the taxpayers to administer and enforce the Tenant protection Act, 1997 that must be consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights the same as the Ombudsman Act must be, or of no force or effect as to its inconsistencies. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. That means any limitations in the Ombudsman’s act or any other are deliberate obstruction of justice and evidence the government never intended to back the individual’s Charter rights. The crimes committed by my former tenant were recorded and witnessed by the judicator, an officer of the Ontario legal system whose moral and legal duty is to eradicate amoral inclination and punish the criminal element to let them and the people know the legal system will not tolerate any one messing with any individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits, whereas punishment attentive to deterrence is the only viable method presently known. If the legal system can not deal with crime that occurs in their courts with irrefutable evidence recorded and documented by one of their people, it is obvious they have no intention of dealing with crime in diligent manner consistent with the Constitution conduce to every persons Charter rights of equal protection. Once you are coherent to the evidence in the 2 part Sun Editor document you will understand the need to get the answers to all the Why’s in the Mad Sad mostly Glad…Why? Go get em!!. Ombudsman The Constitution and the moral people it protects demands the former Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon. John Gerretsen be brought before the courts and the people to account for his actions and the media must inform the people. Should you require any more evidence or help understanding please do not hesitate to communicate with me by e-mail frank@cdf.name. Do not phone. ***************************************************************************************************************** Gather all available evidence for the next exercise of bringing the Attorney General before the courts to account for his actions. Frank Gallagher Manager Charter Democracy Force You can get a copy of the recording of the June 30 2005 Tribunal hearing at the ORHT or the Investigations and Enforcement Unit while you are their questioning. This document “OmbudsmanOctober312008” will be published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition-continued heading Ontario Ombudsman Please respond acknowledging receipt and identifying Ms Did