WizIQ helps you learn and teach online - any subject you can think of!
Join for FREE

Napster Case Study

Add to Favourites
Post to:

Description
Case 4.1

Comments
Presentation Transcript Presentation Transcript

Case 4.1The Napster Case : Case 4.1The Napster Case Thomas Brannen June 27, 2008

Theme Song : Theme Song I’m fighting for freedom Trade Laws? We don’t need ‘em Especially when living In the Information Age

What is Napster : What is Napster Online Music file sharing service Created by Shawn Fanning The first widely used peer to peer sharing service Allowed music fans to share MP3 songs with each other Lead to accusations of massive copyright violations

How it was justified : How it was justified Users stated decreased quality of albums Enabled users to download just one song Users could obtain difficult to obtain song Older songs Unreleased recordings Bootleg recordings

How it was justified Cont. : How it was justified Cont. Some felt it was OK to download songs which they had on cassette tapes of LP Many users simply enjoyed downloading music for free

Who used the Service : Who used the Service College students were main users Up to 80% of network traffic consisted of song transfers Many colleges blocked the use for this reason

Legal Issues : Legal Issues In 2000, A&M records and several other companies sued Napster For contributory and vicarious copyright infringement

Claims Against Napster : Claims Against Napster That its users were directly infringing the plaintiff's copyright That Napster was liable for contributory infringement of the plaintiff's copyright That Napster was liable for vicarious infringement of the plaintiff's copyright.

Napster’s Defense : Napster’s Defense Napster invoked the protection of the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act Provides safe harbor against liability for copyright infringement for intermediaries or search engines. Napster claimed that it was merely a search engine and should be covered under this

Napster’s Defense Cont. : Napster’s Defense Cont. Napster argued that a significant percentage of the system’s use involved legally acceptable copying of music files Claiming many songs were not copyrighted Claimed users were simply sampling music before making a decision on whether to buy Napster compared its service to that of a VCR

Court Decision : Court Decision The court found Napster guilty on all three claims Napster lost the case in the District Court and appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Here it was found that Napster was capable of commercially significant non-infringing uses It still affirmed the District Court’s Decision

Outcome : Outcome Had to monitor their network for infringing material. Paid a $26 million settlement for unauthorized uses of music Paid a $10 million settlement as an advance against future licensing royalties. Napster declared bankruptcy in 2002

Want to learn?

Sign up and browse through relevant courses.

Name:
Your Email:
Password:
Country:
Contact no.:


Area code Number
Subject you are interested in:
Word verification: (Enter the text as in image)


Sign Up Already a member? Sign In
I agree to WizIQ's User Agreement & Privacy Policy

Your Facebook Friends on WizIQ