Breaking WPA with chopchop

Add to Favourites
Post to:

Description
This is a quic overview how is it possible to "crack" WPA and what can be done with it, against it.

Comments
Presentation Transcript Presentation Transcript

Breaking WPA2 with chop-chop attack : Breaking WPA2 with chop-chop attack Marcell FÓTI CEH, ECSA, MCSE, MCDBA, Security MVP, MCT

Unclearable history: WEP : RC4 encryption How a WEP packet looks like? Unclearable history: WEP Data CRC-32

Weaknesses in WEP : Yes, the „random” IV is predictable, Yes, RC4 is not strong enough, Yes, there is no rekeying, but the worst is… The encrypted packet can be guessed byte by byte, without the key! Weaknesses in WEP

Traditional chop-chop : There is an easy formula to correct the encrypted(!) CRC on damaged encrypted(!) WEP packets Supposing we know what was lost If we don’t know what is missing, we can guess it Traditional chop-chop

The WEP-quiz : Sniff an encrypted packet Chop one byte from the end. This is the secret to reveal Correct the damaged packet by using the formula, supposing the secret byte was 1 Send the (supposedly) „repaired” packet to the AP If it broadcasts it, we were right If not, try to repair the checksum with 2 then 3,4… until we win Go to step 2, get the next secret byte The WEP-quiz

The result of chop-chop : After the attack we’ll have The encrypted packet (E) The packet in clear (C) E XOR C = WEP session key ? The result of chop-chop

The strengths of WPA : More random IV ? Additional crypto-checksum Michael, the Message Intergrity Check Lock out for 1 minute after 2 MIC failures in 60 secs Counter in the AP to get rid of replayed packets Rekeying in every hour (3600 secs) But what about compatibility? It is compatible with WEP! The strengths of WPA

The inherent weakness of WPA : It is still encrypted with RC4 Poor Michael is second in the line, so We can guess byte by byte using chop-chop with full speed, if We can avoid the anti-replay counter There are 8 subchannels in WPA Clients always use channel 0 We have 7 more subchannels with counter values way below ours The „good result” is a MIC failure report ? We can guess 1 byte per minute ? Then we get 1 minute relax The inherent weakness of WPA

What we can do with WPA? : There is a reverse-Michael algorithm to get the session key Input parameters we need The actual MIC value in clear text (8 mins, chop-chop) And a packet in clear text… Have a look at an ARP packet 42 encrypted bytes But only 2 bytes are unknown (2 mins, chop-chop) We can decrypt the AP’s key – not the clients’ So we are an AP now! We can start broadcasting ARP poisoning packets MITM begins… What we can do with WPA?

How to prevent this? : Set rekeying frequency to 120 secs instead of 3600 secs Disable TKIP, use AES instead (WPA2) …means get rid of lots of ancient hardware Disable MIC failure Report How to prevent this?

Let’s do it! : Let’s do it! End of theory. And now... LAB: Chop-chop attack (30 minutes)

Want to learn?

Sign up and browse through relevant courses.

Name:
Your Email:
Password:
Country:
Contact no:


Area code Number
Subjects you are interested in:
Word verification: (Enter the text as in image)


Sign Up Already a member? Sign In
I agree to WizIQ's User Agreement & Privacy Policy
40 Members Recommend
83 Followers

Your Facebook Friends on WizIQ

Give live classes, create & sell online courses

Try it free Plans & Pricing

Connect