International Business Management

Add to Favourites
Post to:

Description
Define IBM, Problem and Global Impact of IBM. Theories of international trade

Comments
Presentation Transcript Presentation Transcript

IBM & Theories of international trade : IBM & Theories of international trade Kalpita Chakrabortty

Definition : Definition A field of study and practice that encompasses public and private business activity affecting the persons or institutions of more than one national state, territory or colony - Robinson 1978

Problems in IB : Problems in IB Transaction in foreign language, under foreign law, custom and regulation Information regarding foreign business practices Foreign currency and exchange rate Cultural differences Control and communication Risk level Internationally standard Managerial skill Involvement of intermediaries Monitoring in foreign land

Why go global? : Why go global? To expand sales To acquire resources To diversify sources of sales and supplies To minimize competitive risk Rapid expansion in technology To support international trade To remain in global competition

Theories of international trade : Theories of international trade Theory of comparative costs: Established by Adam Smith and developed by David Ricardo Modern theory of international trade: Developed by economists Heckscher and Bertil Ohlin

Theory of comparative costs : Theory of comparative costs Assumptions Production costs are measures in terms of labor cost only Labor is mobile within nation but immobile between nations Average cost of production does not change as output change There are no change in technology or methods of production There are no restriction on the movement of goods and services between nations Trade is carries by a barter Two country two commodity model

Statement of the theory : Statement of the theory Portugal has comparative advantage on wine England has comparative advantage on cloth Thus two countries needs to specialized

Benefits of specialization of trade : Benefits of specialization of trade Portugal makes one unit of wine against 0.88 unit of cloth England makes one unit of wine against 1.20 units of cloth After specialization of trade 1unit of wine will fetch 1 unit of cloth

Criticisms : Criticisms Unrealistic as it depend on labor theory of value “labor is immobile between countries” – is not true Cost cannot be constant Technology cannot be constant There is practicality of free trade Barter exchange is rare Two country two product model is impractical There is no obligation that a nation must produce those goods where it has cost advantage Complete specialization is not true It may leads exploitation of under develop nation (Socialist view) One sided theory (price difference cannot be on cost difference)

Modern theory of international trade-1 : Modern theory of international trade-1 Hecksvher-Ohlin theory provides an explanation for international cost differences and discuss specialization and trade. Statement of the theory: Countries differ in factor endowments Capital intense Labor intense Products differ in factor requirements Amount of labor require Amount of capital require

Statement : Statement International trade is necessary as there is difference in the relative price of commodities in different countries Price difference is due to difference on factor of production Difference in factor of production is due to factor endowment Thus a capital affluent nation can produce capital intensive good and a labor affluent nation can do well with labor intensive goods.

Assumptions : Assumptions Factor endowments of a country is known, fixed and measurable Factor of production are completely immobile between nations Free trade is not a reality Constant cost and technology There are two factor of production capital and labor

Criticism of Modern theory : Criticism of Modern theory Factor endowment is not know or fixed Factor of production are not completely immobile between nations There is no constant cost or technology Production function is not same among nations “international trade should take place among nations with dissimilar factor of endowment’- is unrealistic Leontiff’s paradox proves that capital abundant nation can export labor intense goods. Theory ignores factors like demand, tastes and preferences, transport cost, technological gap, economies of scale etc. Theory emphasis on cost and price difference also for trading internationally

Want to learn?

Sign up and browse through relevant courses.

Name:
Your Email:
Password:
Country:
Contact no:


Area code Number
Subjects you are interested in:
Word verification: (Enter the text as in image)


Sign Up Already a member? Sign In
I agree to WizIQ's User Agreement & Privacy Policy
Kalpita Chakrabortty
MBA- HR Exp 10 years, Corporate and Business skill
User
6 Followers

Your Facebook Friends on WizIQ

Give live classes, create & sell online courses

Try it free Plans & Pricing

Connect