Financial Statement Analysis : Financial Statement Analysis Financial Statement Analysis for Decision Making
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb A leading company in the health-care and consumer products industry
Sales revenues of $14-billion
Assets of $13-billion
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : How would you compare Bristol-Myers Squibb’s performance against other industry competitors?
Companies differ in size, so you can’t compare absolute dollar amounts
Need to use ratios - tools to translate financial data into percentages - which can be compared across companies Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
Assets 28.0 Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
Sales revenues $13.7
Net income 1.8
Assets 13.0 PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
Assets 28.0 Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
Sales revenues $13.7
Net income 1.8
Assets 13.0 PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
Assets 28.0
Which company was better in generating net income from sales revenues earned? Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
Sales revenues $13.7
Net income 1.8
Assets 13.0
You can use the return on sales ratio to compare PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
Assets 28.0
Which company was better in generating net income from sales revenues earned? Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6 Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
$2.6
$33.4
= 7.78% Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
Sales revenues $13.7
Net income 1.8 PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
$2.6
$33.4
= 7.78% Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
Sales revenues $13.7
Net income 1.8
$1.8
$13.7
= 13.13% PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
$2.6
$33.4
= 7.78% Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
Sales revenues $13.7 PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4 Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb Although P&G’s sales were higher
Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb : BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
Sales revenues $13.7
Net income 1.8
$1.8
$13.7
= 13.13% PROCTER & GAMBLE
Sales revenues $33.4
Net income 2.6
$2.6
$33.4
= 7.78% Opening Vignette - Bristol-Myers Squibb Bristol-Myers’ return on sales was nearly twice that of P&G
Chapter Learning Objectives : Chapter Learning Objectives 1. Perform a horizontal analysis of comparative financial statements
2. Perform a vertical analysis of financial statements
3. Prepare common-size financial statements for benchmarking against the industry average and key competitors
Chapter Learning Objectives : 4. Use the statement of cash flows in decision making
5. Compute the standard financial ratios used for decision making
6. Use ratios in decision making
7. Measure economic value added by a company’s operations Chapter Learning Objectives
Financial Statement Analysis : Financial Statement Analysis External users rely on publicly-available information to perform financial analysis
Such information is contained in corporate annual report
Annual Report Contents : FOUR BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Annual Report Contents
Annual Report Contents : FOUR BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Annual Report Contents
Annual Report Contents : FOUR BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOOTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Annual Report Contents
Annual Report Contents : FOUR BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOOTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING METHODS Annual Report Contents
Annual Report Contents : FOUR BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOOTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING METHODS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Annual Report Contents
Annual Report Contents : FOUR BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOOTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING METHODS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT Annual Report Contents
Annual Report Contents : FOUR BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOOTNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING METHODS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDITOR’S REPORT COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL DATA FOR A SERIES OF YEARS Annual Report Contents
Financial Statement Analysis : Financial Statement Analysis Before you jump to a decision, consider the following:
1. Financial statements provide data about what happened during the accounting period Pick the one annual report component which provides investors and creditors with the most descriptive information about the corporation’s activities and financial condition
Financial Statement Analysis : Financial Statement Analysis 2. Investors and creditors use information contained in the annual report to:
Forecast future income and cash flows
Assess risk of investing in or lending to the corporation
Financial Statement Analysis : MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 4 Financial Statement Analysis
Financial Statement Analysis : Financial Statement Analysis Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) includes:
Evaluation of current business operations
Assessment of future operations
Tools to Evaluate Financial Information : Tools to Evaluate Financial Information
Tools to Evaluate Financial Information : Tools to Evaluate Financial Information Horizontal Analysis
Tools to Evaluate Financial Information : Tools to Evaluate Financial Information Horizontal Analysis
Vertical Analysis
Tools to Evaluate Financial Information : Tools to Evaluate Financial Information Horizontal Analysis
Vertical Analysis
Ratio Analysis
Chapter Objective 1 : Chapter Objective 1 Perform a horizontal analysis of comparative financial statements
Tools to Evaluate Financial Information : Tools to Evaluate Financial Information
Tools to Evaluate Financial Information : Tools to Evaluate Financial Information Horizontal Analysis
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis Examines percentage change in each item on the financial statements
Compares current year’s dollar amount with prior year’s dollar amount
Expresses the change in
Dollars
Percentage
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis First, calculate dollar change from base year (prior year) to current year
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis First, calculate dollar change from base year (prior year) to current year
Second, divide dollar change by base-year dollar amount
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis Let’s use several pieces of information from The Home Depot’s balance sheet - provided in the opening pages of textbook Chapter 7 - to illustrate the process of horizontal analysis
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225
Difference
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159
Difference
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159
Divide
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Divide
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918 15.3
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918 15.3
Notes Receivable 54,715 32,528
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918 15.3
Notes Receivable 54,715 32,528 22,187
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918 15.3
Notes Receivable 54,715 32,528 22,187 68.2
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918 15.3
Notes Receivable 54,715 32,528 22,187 68.2
Total Assets 7,354,033 5,778,041
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918 15.3
Notes Receivable 54,715 32,528 22,187 68.2
Total Assets 7,354,033 5,778,041 1,575,992
Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal Analysis DOLLAR AMOUNT INCREASE (DECREASE)
Amounts in thousands
1996 1995 Dollars %
Receivables (net) $325,384 $272,225 $53,159 19.5%
Leasehold Improv. 314,933 273,015 41,918 15.3
Notes Receivable 54,715 32,528 22,187 68.2
Total Assets 7,354,033 5,778,041 1,575,992 27.3
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages Specialized form of horizontal analysis
Shows trend of financial statement items over longer time periods such as 5 or 10 years
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages Base year (earliest year in the time series) set at 100%
All other years expressed as percentage of base year
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages Income statement amounts for Ray’s Seafood Shack are presented in the next slide
Compute the trend percentages for these items
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Divide
x 100
Net Sales 206% 160% 145% 137% 130% 100%
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Divide
x 100
Net Sales 206% 160% 145% 137% 130% 100%
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Divide
x 100
Net Sales 206% 160% 145% 137% 130% 100%
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Divide
x 100
Net Sales 206% 160% 145% 137% 130% 100%
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Divide
x 100
Net Sales 206% 160% 145% 137% 130% 100%
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Cost of Sales 373 265 201 259 280 193
Net Sales 206% 160% 145% 137% 130% 100%
Cost of Sales 193 137 104 134 145 100
Trend Percentages : Trend Percentages (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS )
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
Net Sales $714 $553 $502 $474 $451 $346
Cost of Sales 373 265 201 259 280 193
Gross Profit 341 288 301 215 171 153
Net Sales 206% 160% 145% 137% 130% 100%
Cost of Sales 193 137 104 134 145 100
Gross Profit 223 188 197 140 112 100
Horizontal Analysis and Trend Percentages: A Summary : Horizontal Analysis and Trend Percentages: A Summary Tools used to compare financial results of companies of different sizes and/or in different industries
Chapter Objective 2 : Chapter Objective 2 Perform a vertical analysis of financial statements
Vertical Analysis : Vertical Analysis
Vertical Analysis : Vertical Analysis Vertical Analysis
Vertical Analysis : Vertical Analysis Compares each item on the financial statement to a key, or base, item
Base-item dollar amount always set to 100%
Income statement
Net sales = 100%
Balance sheet
Total assets = 100%
Vertical Analysis : 19X7 19X6
AMOUNT % AMOUNT %
Net sales $430,013 100% $362,386 100%
Cost of Goods Sold 336,589 78 284,897 79
Gross Profit 93,424 22 77,489 21
Selling, General & Admin. 72,363 17 65,096 18
Income from Operations 21,061 5 12,393 3
Income Taxes 7,072 2 4,350 2
Net Income $13,989 3% $8,043 2% Vertical Analysis
Vertical Analysis : Vertical Analysis Once financial statement items are converted into percentages of the base item, users can compare one company’s financials against another’s
These are called common-size statements
Chapter Objective 3 : Chapter Objective 3 Prepare common-size financial statements for benchmarking against the industry average and key competitors
Common-Size Statements : Common-Size Statements Show all items as percentages of the key, or base, amount
Use no dollar amounts
Facilitate financial statement comparison among different sized companies
Improve user’s ability to assess company performance against industry averages
Common-Size Statements : Common-Size Statements Can also be used to evaluate company performance over time
Refer to textbook Exhibit 13-6
Benchmarking Against the Industry Average : Benchmarking Against the Industry Average Benchmarking is a term used to describe the process of comparing a company’s activities to a standard of excellence achieved by industry leaders
Benchmarking Against Key Competitors : A company also can compare its common-size financials to those of its industry’s leaders
Determine where it differs
Design and implement business processes to bring financial results in line with these benchmark entities Benchmarking Against Key Competitors
Benchmarking Against Key Competitors : Examine textbook Exhibits 13-7 and 13-8 to see how common-size financials can be used in benchmarking Benchmarking Against Key Competitors
Chapter Objective 4 : Chapter Objective 4 Use the statement of cash flows in decision making
Statement of Cash Flows in Decision Making : Statement of Cash Flows in Decision Making Summarizes sources and uses of entity’s cash flows
Internal and external decision makers want to see majority of cash inflows coming from operating activities
WHY?
Statement of Cash Flows in Decision Making : Company cannot stay in business for long if it cannot generate enough cash from operations to cover operating expenses
While borrowing and investing activities provide cash for business use, long-term reliance on these activities for sources of cash is not advised Statement of Cash Flows in Decision Making
Chapter Objective 5 : Chapter Objective 5 Compute the standard financial ratios used for decision making
Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions : Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions
Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions : Ratio Analysis Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions
Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions : Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions Ratios - the relationship between two items on financial statements - permit users to calculate a variety of financial comparisons
These ratios can be compared to:
Prior years’ financial results
Industry averages
Benchmark entities’ ratios
Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions : Ratios measure an entity’s ability to:
Pay current liabilities
Sell inventory and collect receivables
Pay long-term debt
Generate profits from operations
Sustain shareholder wealth Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions
Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions : Access to computerized spreadsheets, integrated financial analysis software, and financial databases makes ratio calculation a snap! Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Current Liabilities One measure of entity’s ability to pay its current obligations is to look at working capital
Current assets - current liabilities
2 ratios help users assess working capital information
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Current Liabilities One measure of entity’s ability to pay its current obligations is to look at working capital
Current assets - current liabilities
2 ratios help users assess working capital information
Current ratio
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Current Liabilities One measure of entity’s ability to pay its current obligations is to look at working capital
Current assets - current liabilities
2 ratios help users assess working capital information
Current ratio
Quick (acid-test) ratio
Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions : We’ll use the Lands’ End, Inc., financial statements from textbook Chapter 1 to illustrate a variety of financial ratios for business decision making
All dollar amounts presented are in thousands Using Ratios to Make Business Decisions
Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Ability to Pay Current Liabilities Current ratio
Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Ability to Pay Current Liabilities Current ratio
Current assets
Current liabilities
Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Ability to Pay Current Liabilities Current ratio
Current assets
Current liabilities
$222,089
$114,744
= 1.94
Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Ability to Pay Current Liabilities Quick ratio
Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Ability to Pay Current Liabilities Quick ratio
Current assets - inventory - prepaid items
Current liabilities
Ability to Pay Current Liabilities : Ability to Pay Current Liabilities Current ratio
Current assets - inventory - prepaid items
Current liabilities
$25,240
$114,744
= .22
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables : Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables Entity’s operating cycle
Time to go from cash to inventory to receivables to cash
is critical to generating cash inflows from operating activities
3 ratios help users assess management’s skill in selling inventory and collecting receivables
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables : Inventory turnover Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables 1
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables : Inventory turnover
A/R turnover Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables 1 2
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables : Inventory turnover
A/R turnover
Days’ sales in receivables Measuring the Company’s Ability to Sell Inventory and Collect Receivables 1 2 3
Inventory Turnover : Inventory Turnover Number of times the average level of inventory is sold during the accounting year
Measures time required to earn return on company’s investment in inventory
Inventory Turnover : Inventory Turnover Cost of goods sold
Average inventory
Inventory Turnover : Inventory Turnover Cost of goods sold
Average inventory
$588,017
($164,816 + $168,652) / 2
= 3.53
Inventory Turnover : Inventory Turnover High ratio indicates ability to quickly sell inventory
Too high a ratio may indicate inadequate inventory levels
Turnover ratio should be compared to historical and industry averages
Analyze significant variances
Accounts Receivable Turnover : Accounts Receivable Turnover Number of times the average level of A/R is collected during the accounting year
Measures ability to collect cash from credit customers $
Accounts Receivable Turnover : Accounts Receivable Turnover Net credit sales
Average net A/R
Accounts Receivable Turnover : Net credit sales*
Average net A/R
$1,031,548*
($8,064 + $4,459) / 2
= 165
* Lands’ End’s ratio is not accurate. Net credit sales figure is unavailable. Net sales from the income statement used instead. Accounts Receivable Turnover
Days’ Sales in Receivables : Days’ Sales in Receivables Number of equivalent days’ sales revenue represented by the outstanding A/R balance
Measures A/R balance in terms of number of days it would take to generate the equivalent dollar amount of sales $
Days’ Sales in Receivables : Average net A/R
(Net sales / 365 days) Days’ Sales in Receivables
Days’ Sales in Receivables : Average net A/R
(Net sales / 365 days)
$6,262
($1,031,548 / 365 days)
= 2.22 days Days’ Sales in Receivables
Days’ Sales in Receivables : Lands’ End’s receivables ratios look unusual when compared to the textbook and industry averages
This is due to significant volume of sales made with bank cards like VISA, MasterCard, and American Express Days’ Sales in Receivables
Days’ Sales in Receivables : These sales treated like cash sales - merchandisers receive payment for them almost immediately
Lands’ End’s receivables are rather small when compared to total net sales
Not the situation for retailers like JCPenney or Montgomery Ward who offer their own lines of revolving credit Days’ Sales in Receivables
Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Long-Term Debt : Measuring the Company’s Ability to Pay Long-Term Debt Bondholders and long-term lenders are concerned about an entity’s ability to repay debt principal and accumulated interest on long-term notes and loans
2 ratios help these users assess the entity’s ability to pay its long-term obligations
Debt ratio
Times-interest-earned ratio
Debt Ratio : Debt Ratio Relationship between company’s total liabilities and total assets
Measures proportion of total assets provided through debt
1 - debt ratio = proportion of assets provided by equity
Debt Ratio : Debt Ratio Total Liabilities
Total Assets
Debt Ratio : Debt Ratio Total Liabilities
Total Assets
$122,305
$323,497
= .38
Debt Ratio : Debt Ratio Total Liabilities
Total Assets
$122,305
$323,497
= .38
Debt Ratio : Debt Ratio If debt ratio = 1.0, company used all debt to finance acquisition of its assets
A highly unlikely situation
Thus, debt ratio is generally less than 1.0 LOANS,
NOTES,
BONDS,
ETC.
Debt Ratio : Debt Ratio The higher the ratio, the more cash the company must commit toward paying annual interest expense and loan principal
As a result, company’s cash flow might be negatively affected
Debt Ratio : Lenders and creditors might require company to appropriate portion of retained earnings to ensure sufficient assets to repay interest and loan principal Debt Ratio
Times-Interest-Earned Ratio : Times-Interest-Earned Ratio Relationship between company’s net income from operations and interest expense
Measures ability of company to cover, or pay for, its interest expense out of operating income
Times-Interest-Earned Ratio : Times-Interest-Earned Ratio Income from operations
Interest expense
Times-Interest-Earned Ratio : Times-Interest-Earned Ratio Income from operations
Interest expense
$49,165
$2,771
= 17.7
Times-Interest-Earned Ratio : Lands’ End’s high ratio indicates ease in meeting debt interest payments Times-Interest-Earned Ratio
Times-Interest-Earned Ratio : A low ratio would signal possible difficulties in making payments to lenders and bondholders Times-Interest-Earned Ratio
Measuring a Company’s Profitability : Measuring a Company’s Profitability Financial analysts pay close attention to ratios which assess a company’s ability to generate profits and operate efficiently
Creditors and investors rely on forecasts of a company’s potential to generate net income when they make lending and investing choices
Measuring a Company’s Profitability : 4 profitability ratios are commonly used in financial statement analysis Measuring a Company’s Profitability
Measuring a Company’s Profitability : 4 profitability ratios are commonly used in financial statement analysis
Return on sales Measuring a Company’s Profitability
Measuring a Company’s Profitability : 4 profitability ratios are commonly used in financial statement analysis
Return on sales
Return on assets Measuring a Company’s Profitability
Measuring a Company’s Profitability : 4 profitability ratios are commonly used in financial statement analysis
Return on sales
Return on assets
Return on equity Measuring a Company’s Profitability
Measuring a Company’s Profitability : 4 profitability ratios are commonly used in financial statement analysis
Return on sales
Return on assets
Return on equity
Earnings per share Measuring a Company’s Profitability
Return on Sales : Relationship between a company’s net income and net sales
Measures management’s ability to efficiently and effectively manage company operations
Shows percentage of each net sales dollar earned as net income Return on Sales
Return on Sales : Return on Sales Net income
Net sales revenue
Return on Sales : Return on Sales Net income
Net sales revenue
$ 30,555
$1,031,548
= .0296
Return on Sales : Higher rate tells users that more net sales dollars add to a company’s profits
And fewer dollars go to cover company expenses
Company conducts its business effectively, manages expenses Return on Sales Net Income
Return on Assets : Ratio of the return to the two groups that provide financing to the company
Creditors and investors
and average assets owned during the period
Measures company’s success in generating income from its available resources Return on Assets
Return on Assets : Net income + interest expense
Average total assets Return on Assets
Return on Assets : Net income + interest expense
Average total assets
$30,555 + 2,771
($323,497 + $297,613) / 2
= .1073 Return on Assets
Return on Assets : Return on Assets Why do we add back interest expense to net income?
Return on Assets : Total assets are financed by 2 sources:
Investors (equity)
Creditors (debt)
Net income is the return attributable to investors in the company’s stock
Interest expense is the return paid to creditors for using their funds to acquire assets Return on Assets
Return on Equity : Relationship between net income available to common stockholders and the equity they provide
Measures company’s success in using stockholders’ investments to generate net income Return on Equity
Return on Equity : Return on Equity Net income - preferred dividends
Common contributed capital + retained earnings
Return on Equity : Return on Equity Net income - preferred dividends
Common contributed capital + retained earnings
$30,555*
($286,676 + $255,773) / 2
= .1126
* Lands’ End does not have preferred stock
Earnings Per Share : Relationship between net income available to common stockholders and the number of shares of common stock issued
Expresses net income in terms of one share of the company’s common stock Earnings Per Share
Earnings Per Share : Earnings Per Share Net income - preferred dividends
# of shares of common stock outstanding
Earnings Per Share : Earnings Per Share Net income - preferred dividends
# of shares of common stock outstanding
$30,555,000*
40,221,000 shares
= $.76
* Lands’ End does not have preferred stock;
numbers shown are actual amounts
Earnings Per Share : Earnings Per Share In addition to net income, EPS is presented for several other elements on the corporate income statement
Discontinued operations
Extraordinary items
Cumulative effect of accounting change Earnings per share (EPS) disclosure on the face of the corporate income statement is mandatory
Analyzing the Company’s Stock as an Investment : Analyzing the Company’s Stock as an Investment
Analyzing the Company’s Stock as an Investment : Investors expect to receive 2 types of returns on their investments in a corporation’s common stock
Gains earned when they sell the corporation’s stock
Periodic dividends paid by the corporation to its stockholders Analyzing the Company’s Stock as an Investment
Analyzing the Company’s Stock as an Investment : Financial analysts use several ratios to assess value of stock investments
Price/earnings ratio
Dividend yield
Book value Analyzing the Company’s Stock as an Investment
Price/Earnings Ratio : Price/Earnings Ratio Relationship between a stock’s market price and its earnings per share
Measures the number of times one share of stock sells above the current period’s reported earnings
Assists financial analysts in deciding if a stock is overpriced or underpriced
Price/Earnings Ratio : Calculating the P/E ratio Price/Earnings Ratio
Price/Earnings Ratio : Calculating the P/E ratio
Market value of stock
Earnings per share Price/Earnings Ratio
Price/Earnings Ratio : Suppose the market value of Asian Art, Inc., common stock is $15.75 on the last day of its fiscal year Calculating the P/E ratio
Market value of stock
Earnings per share Price/Earnings Ratio
Price/Earnings Ratio : Suppose the market value of Asian Art, Inc., common stock is $15.75 on the last day of its fiscal year
The income statement reports EPS of $.92 Price/Earnings Ratio Calculating the P/E ratio
Market value of stock
Earnings per share
Price/Earnings Ratio : Suppose the market value of Asian Art, Inc., common stock is $15.75 on the last day of its fiscal year
The income statement reports EPS of $.92
What is Asian Art’s price/earnings ratio? Price/Earnings Ratio Calculating the P/E ratio
Market value of stock
Earnings per share
Price/Earnings Ratio : Price/Earnings Ratio Market value of stock
Earnings per share
Price/Earnings Ratio : Price/Earnings Ratio Market value of stock
Earnings per share
$15.75
$.92
= 17.12
Dividend Yield : Dividend Yield Ratio of dividends per share of stock to the stock’s market value
Indicates the percentage of a stock’s market value “returned” to the stockholder in the form of dividends
Assists investors who desire a steady flow of dividend revenue in their decisions to invest in a particular stock
Dividend Yield : Dividend Yield Annual dividends per share
Stock’s market value per share
If Asian Art paid a total of $1.25 in dividends per share, what would be its dividend yield, assuming the same market value for its stock ($15.75)?
Dividend Yield : Dividend Yield Annual dividends per share
Stock’s market value per share
Dividend Yield : Dividend Yield Annual dividends per share
Stock’s market value per share
$1.25
$15.75
= .079
Book Value : Book Value Relationship between common stockholders’ equity and number of common shares outstanding
Measures the accounting value of one share of the corporation’s common stock DEBIT CREDIT
Book Value : Book Value Total equity - preferred equity
# of shares of common stock outstanding
The book value of one share of Lands’ End common stock is:
$201,192,000
40,221,000 shares
= $5.00/share
Chapter Objective 6 : Chapter Objective 6 Use ratios in decision making
Limitations of Financial Analysis : Limitations of Financial Analysis No one ratio or year’s worth of financial information should be relied upon to provide a complete assessment of a corporation’s financial condition
Analysts should:
Examine trends over time
Benchmark to industry and key competitors
Seek answers about why ratios are different
Limitations of Financial Analysis : Limitations of Financial Analysis Recall the W.T. Grant bankruptcy discussed in textbook Chapter 12
Limitations of Financial Analysis : Limitations of Financial Analysis Recall the W.T. Grant bankruptcy discussed in textbook Chapter 12
Grant’s ratios were reasonably good up until several years before its failure
Limitations of Financial Analysis : Limitations of Financial Analysis But analysts and the investing public continued to believe the company’s strong history would carry it forward Recall the W.T. Grant bankruptcy discussed in textbook Chapter 12
Grant’s ratios were reasonably good up until several years before its failure
Limitations of Financial Analysis : Limitations of Financial Analysis But analysts and the investing public continued to believe the company’s strong history would carry it forward
Financial statement users didn’t consider the social and economic changes of the early 1970s and how these affected the retailer! Recall the W.T. Grant bankruptcy discussed in textbook Chapter 12
Grant’s ratios were reasonably good up until several years before its failure
The Complexity of Business Decisions : The Complexity of Business Decisions Business environment is complicated by numerous local, regional, national, and global issues - all must be considered when evaluating current financial condition or forecasting future potential for income
Chapter Objective 7 : Chapter Objective 7 Measure economic value added by a company’s operations
Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance : Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance Measure of increase in stockholder wealth brought about by corporate operating activities
Returns to the 2 providers of capital
Investors
Lenders
should exceed amount these providers charge the corporation to use their capital
Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance : Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance Net income +
interest exp.
Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance : Notes + loans +
long-term debt +
stockholders’
equity Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance x Net income +
interest exp.
Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance : Notes + loans +
long-term debt +
stockholders’
equity Economic Value Added - A New Measure of Performance x Net income +
interest exp. Cost of
capital
World Wide Web Sites to Visit : World Wide Web Sites to Visit Bristol-Myers Squibb
http://www.bms.com/
Procter & Gamble
http://www.pg.com/
Slide 178 : TIME TO
REST