CRP ~ Benchmarking

CRP Benchmarking : CRP Benchmarking

Main Benchmark Groups : Main Benchmark Groups Organisational Strategies adopted to introduce CRP Institutional Ownership of CRP Programme Development Accountability to Children as stakeholders

1 Organisational strategies for implementing CRP : 1 Organisational strategies for implementing CRP Benchmark 1 ~ A clear mandate, vision and mission expresses commitment to child rights and CRP Benchmark 2 ~ Policies and strategies translate the mandate and mission into practice Benchmark 3 ~ Staffing policies, including recruitment and induction,facilitate effective CRP Benchmark 4 ~ Tools, guidance, planning guidance have been developed to build capacity for CRP Benchmark 5 ~ Cross-sectoral support has been introduced to strengthen an integrated approach to CRP

2 Institutional ownership of CRP : 2 Institutional ownership of CRP Benchmark 6 ~ All staff and Board members have a clear understanding of and commitment to CRP Benchmark 7 ~ Staff feel competent and confident in CRP Benchmark 8 ~ Partners are supported and enabled to work within a right-based approach

3 Programme development : 3 Programme development Benchmark 9 ~ Situation analysis is directed towards mapping rights violations, and identifying causes and duty bearers, through a process that respects the views of children Benchmark 10 Priority setting and planning is informed by a rights-based perspective, and takes account of the views of children Benchmark 11 Implementation is directed towards the fulfilment of all children’s rights, without discrimination, involving both holding duty bearers accountable and supporting children to claim their rights Benchmark 12 Monitoring and evaluation is informed by CRP both in respect of its process and focus

4 Accountability to children as stakeholders : 4 Accountability to children as stakeholders Benchmark 13 Children are acknowledged as stakeholders within Save the Children Benchmark 14 Mechanisms for accountability to children have been introduced