Human evolution-Part 1

Law of Relitivity VS the Theory of Evolution.

The single dominant question which I always have for evolution is that we understand much about Darwin. But in the same we still have this bizarre thought that we evolved from apes.

If we did in fact evolve from apes, why then are there still apes?

The law of relitivity is simple, stating that nothing is special. In this it becomes fact that we did not evolve from apes. There is no "missing link" that connects to apes, and there is no way for there to be one since we did not evolve special. And even though I have had people argue the point that in diferent areas things evolve diferently, there are still people in Africa, all human, and yet there are, still apes. So if we evolved in a diferent area than apes there would be no humans in Africa.

This is simple. And yes Darwin is correct that species evolve, Humans have and are evolving, however, not from apes. I think it would be a nice advancement if we as a species stopped reaching for answers which the laws of phsics which are proven (relitivity) overcome the same bad rhetoric of our past. And though it is essential to leaqrn from classical science. It is classical science, and relitivity is a theory which needs to move from modern science to classical science, where it belongs.