Risk MonitoringWeek #4 – CRISC Exam Prep ~ Domain #3 : Risk MonitoringWeek #4 – CRISC Exam Prep ~ Domain #3 Bill PankeyTunitas Group
Job Practice : Job Practice Collect and validate data that measure key risk indicators (KRIs) to monitor and communicate their status to relevant stakeholders.
Monitor and communicate key risk indicators (KRIs) and management activities to assist relevant stakeholders in their decision-making process.
Facilitate independent risk assessments and risk management process reviews to ensure they are performed efficiently and effectively.
Identify and report on risk, including compliance, to initiate corrective action and meet business and regulatory requirements. CRISCRisk Monitoring
Domain
Agenda : Agenda Key Risk Indicators
What are they
How to construct
How are they used
How are they improved
How are they reported
Data Aggregation
Benchmarking
No distinct RiskIT ‘monitoring’ process
Expansive View of “Risk Monitoring” : Expansive View of “Risk Monitoring” Risk Governance Objective Monitor the overall performance / effectiveness of the risk management program and recommend improvement (COSO) Risk Management Objective Ensure the current and emerging levels of risk are within tolerance levels.
2nd Order Uncertainty : 2nd Order Uncertainty Risk is a statement about the potential for [future] loss events
Manage by control; avoidance; sharing …
Risk monitoring identifies and evaluates changes in risk
Whether potential for loss is increasing / decreasing
Added opportunity to manage risk
Surprisingly, statements about changes is risk are less ambiguous, more objective than the statement of risk
Key Risk Indicator (KRI) : Key Risk Indicator (KRI) Metric / observation used to
track risk level at specific time point
where likely unacceptable loss or ‘trouble ahead’
Indicator becomes ‘key’ when
Tracks an important risk
Is reliable, cost effective, …
# of unpatched systems is a risk indicator, but may not be ‘key’
What is the risk that is being tracked?
How important is that risk?
KRI are not KPI …KPI could be KRI : KRI are not KPI …KPI could be KRI KRI are leading indicators
Intended to be predictive of future loss / outcome
Key Performance Indicators are lagging indicators
Report on accomplishment of activity / process
A given KPI could be used as a KRI or component of KRI
% of [expected] function points delivered on time
Measure of project efficiency / could be used as indicator of project delivery risk
KRI proxies Risk Measures : KRI proxies Risk Measures Source: Risk Management Association 2005 survey of Financial institutions Operational risk
management Strategy Normalization Risk Communication Compliance ??? KRI Uses
Why KRI are Important : Why KRI are Important Risk factor ~ condition influencing frequency, magnitude business impact of the loss event / scenario Change in risk factor [some] risk indicator
Logically and [typically] temporally prior to risk event
KRI Selection : KRI Selection Unlimited # of risk indicators in logs, alarms, reports …
What to select for regular monitoring as KPI
Reflects management priorities
Stakeholder concern
Strategic and / or operational business impact
Management utility / basis of management report
Basis for risk communication
“What gets measured, gets done”, Drucker, The Practice of Management
KPI Goodness Criteria : KPI Goodness Criteria Associated with one or more specific risks
Measureable at specific points in time
Objective finding rather than a subjective assessment
Track at least one risk factor
Actionable Effectiveness
KPI Goodness Criteria : KPI Goodness Criteria Quantified (#, %, ratio, rate)
Well defined / reproducible
Time independence
[Business] Process independence
Auditable
Comparable across organizations (?) Comparability
KPI Goodness Criteria : KPI Goodness Criteria Timely, readily available in reasonable time frame
Cost effective to collect as a production of automated system, by-product of process or service
Obvious … easily understood and communicated Efficiency
KPI Process Steps : KPI Process Steps Data access
Ensure timely, reliable data delivery
Data validation
Match definition; complete; within range; missing data(?); duplicates (?); reliability of derived values; ‘referential’ integrity
reasonableness checks!
Data analysis
Statistical computations
Conclusions / inference
Reporting
Right people, right format ISACA
Best Practice
KPI Optimization : KPI Optimization Optimization criteria
Sensitivity
Appropriate level of alert; # of red flags; Critical conditions, etc
Timing
How much lead time
Frequency
How rapidly may new risk condition develop; express themselves
Corrective action
Utility for tracking remediation effort; assigning priority (MBO)
KPI autocorrelations, correlations with each other, loss and performance data provide an empirical basis for optimization
Regression analysis ISACA
Best Practice
KPI Validity: Causal Factors : KPI Validity: Causal Factors Utilize expertise of subject matter experts, process and service owners
Identify the risk scenarios of greatest concern
Decompose scenario into leading risk factors
Identify indicators for those factors
Observable measures; critical thresholds or change
Develop KPI reporting scheme
KPI Timing : KPI Timing Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 – new demand for certified IT professional
KRI: Industry Salary Index (annual) Loss of key IT personnel
KRI: Mid-level Staff retention rate Failed IT project Early indication greater opportunity for correction
Pro-Active Risk Management : Pro-Active Risk Management
Aggregation : Aggregation Address management concern regarding ‘overall’ risk :
Specific business objectives
Strategic | Operational
Customer
Product
Regulation
Business Unit
… arbitrary level of specificity
Management interest is greatest when ‘all variety of risk’ is reported
Aggregation : Aggregation Diversity Problem:
For different risk domains (say IT, Legal, Finance ..)
KRI are specialized
KRI have different time periods
KRI have different granularity
KRI have varying sensitivity
KRI have varying relevance, reliability and validity
This is a problem that is not solved so much as overcome
Aggregation Heuristic : Aggregation Heuristic Report risk as dimensionless quantity (kounts, %)
Report risk as % red, yellow, green
Code each KPI relative to threshold (red or green)
For each risk, count the number of associated KPI above of below threshold
Report risk as increasing of decreasing
# KPI indicating lesser risk / # KPI indicating greater risk
Loss data
Cumulative impact of loss events
Possible impact of “managed events”(intervention)
Management Report : Management Report Visual display of risk based on risk indicators
With thanks to Excel, easy to produce
Dashboards ….Red light / green light … ‘gauges’
Heat Maps
Spider Diagrams
Industry Risk Benchmarks : Industry Risk Benchmarks Collection & summarization of risk data
Loss data
KRI
Source for:
Validation of enterprise results
Trend analysis
Risk analysis data
Comparative benchmarking (company)
e.g. Standard KPI Specification : e.g. Standard KPI Specification www. KRIeX.org Repository ~ 2500 KPI specified and monitored
e.g., Loss Data : e.g., Loss Data
Bottom Line : Bottom Line Express organizational 'risk appetite’ in terms of a KPI threshold value
Alert management to trends that may affect achievement of objectives
Use KPI to initiate mitigation activity
Provides measurable data conducive to aggregation
Assists in demonstrating compliance
Next Week : Next Week CRISC Domain #4
Control Design & Implementation