Advanced-placement chemistry teacher development t

 
Advanced-placement chemistry teacher development through an online course CHED 1221
By: Paull
1 years 0 months ago
Copy and paste these links in your blog or web site to share the presentation.
URL:
Embed:
Thumbnail:
Report Spam Share Presentation Download
Add to my content
 
Related Presentations
COGS General As...
Undergrad and Grad
By lee Luther
GEOL 414 Applie...
Undergrad and Grad
By Andrew Hudson
Focus Group: Co...
Undergrad and Grad
By Lambert Ardy
Presentation Transcript
Advanced-placement chemistry teacher development through an online course CHED 1221 : Mike Readnour Advanced-placement chemistry teacher development through an online course CHED 1221 Department of Chemistry Southeast Missouri State University Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 225th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March 23-27, 2003 Michael L. Rodgers
Southeast Missouri State University : Regional, comprehensive, Masters granting 9,000 Students 380 Full and Term Faculty Strong commitment to Teaching/Learning Use of Instructional Technology in Teaching Faculty Development Advanced Placement Teacher Development Southeast Missouri State University
About Advanced Placement … : About Advanced Placement … Each year the College Board sponsors Institutes designed to train high school teachers to teach Advanced Placement (AP) courses. The first totally online AP Chemistry Teacher Training Institute was developed and taught for UCLA Extension on the World-Wide-Web in Summer 2002 (http://cstl-csm.semo.edu/APCHEM/). Our presentation addresses some of the special challenges and opportunities associated with developing and teaching an online AP Chemistry training course that included a lab component. We also present survey data showing that lack of geographic access to a face-to-face Institute was the primary reason students chose the online environment, but the students nevertheless found the online experience to be valuable preparation to teach AP Chemistry.
Advanced Placement (AP) Chemistry : Advanced Placement (AP) Chemistry One year high school course Sponsored by the College Board Usually the 2nd chemistry course Equivalent to college general chemistry AP Chemistry Exam National exam prepared by Educational Testing Service Taken at the end of the AP course College credit received by students who score well
Traditional Teacher Development Course : Traditional Teacher Development Course Prepares HS teachers to teach AP Chemistry Face-to-Face (“F2F”) Activities Review Exam content Perform lab experiments appropriate for AP Chemistry Acquaint teachers with the AP Chemistry Exam, including Exam composition Working problems from released Exams Grading the Exam
F2F Teacher Development Course : F2F Teacher Development Course Assumes good background in first-year HS Chemistry content Chemistry content pretest and posttest Emphasis on topics not covered in first-year HS Chemistry
F2F Teacher Development Course : F2F Teacher Development Course AP Chemistry course topics published in “Advanced Placement Program Course Description for Chemistry” “Acorn Book”
F2F Teacher Development Course : F2F Teacher Development Course Strong emphasis on laboratory Lab experience should be equivalent to that of college general chemistry Thirteen lab experiments appropriate for AP Chemistry conducted
Web-Based (Online) Development Course : Web-Based (Online) Development Course AP Chemistry Course and Exam Classifying Chemical Reactions and Predicting Their Products Chemical Kinetics Chemical Equilibrium Thermochemistry & Thermodynamics Electrochemistry Course Syllabus Modular Approach
Web-Based (Online) Development Course : Web-Based (Online) Development Course Most modules include Multiple choice questions Free response problems Lesson plans Labs directed to topics or built on iron (III) oxalate chemistry Course Syllabus Capstone Modular Approach (Cont’d)
Web-Based (Online) Development Course : Web-Based (Online) Development Course Module One: AP Chemistry Course and Exam Personal Information Quiz Registering with AP Central (College Board Web Page) Topical outline and recommended labs Scoring student responses to exam questions Calculating a students composite AP exam score Multiple choice questions on general topics Laboratory- Green Crystalline Compound: Synthesis
Web-Based (Online) Development Course : Web-Based (Online) Development Course Module Two: Classifying Chemical Reactions and Predicting Their Products Free response problems Lesson Plan Laboratory- Green Crystalline Compound: % Water Laboratory- Classifying Chemical Reactions and Predicting Their Products
Web-Based (Online) Development Course : Web-Based (Online) Development Course Module Three: Chemical Kinetics Multiple choice questions Free response problems Lesson plan Laboratory- Kinetics of the Reaction of Thiosulfate with Hydronium Ion Module Four: Chemical Equilibrium Multiple choice questions Free response problems Lesson plan Laboratory- Antacids Experiment
Web-Based (Online) Development Course : Web-Based (Online) Development Course Module Five: Thermochemistry and Thermodynamics Multiple choice questions Free response problems Lesson plan Laboratory- Heats of Reaction and Hess’s Law
Web-Based (Online) Development Course : Web-Based (Online) Development Course Module Six: Electrochemistry Multiple choice questions Free response problems Lesson plan Laboratory- Voltaic Cells Laboratory- Green Crystalline Compound: %K and %Fe Module Seven: Course Syllabus Syllabus Laboratory- Green Crystalline Compound: %C2O42-, Empirical Formula and % Yield
Comparing Face-to-Face & Online Courses : Comparing Face-to-Face & Online Courses
TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 : TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 4.5 units      Fee: $500 This 45-hour equivalent intensive online course is intended for teachers who are designing an Advanced Placement (AP) high school chemistry course or teaching existing courses. Initially, participants are introduced to the AP chemistry course requirements and the format of the AP chemistry exam through The College Board materials. Modules on five different chemical topics are covered, and participants develop lesson plans on these topics. Problems and questions from previously released AP exams are used to relate the course content to the concepts and principles addressed by the exams. The heart of the course focuses on the development of nine laboratory experiments by the participants that meet The College Board requirements for recommended laboratories. Participants are required to perform two of the developed experiments in laboratories at their schools. Five of the laboratory experiments are tied to the topical modules. Finally, the teachers are required to develop an AP course syllabus.
TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 : TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 4.5 units      Fee: $500 45-hour equivalent For teachers designing an AP high school chemistry course or teaching existing courses. Content, assignments similar to F2F course Blackboard online environment College Board endorsed & observed 7/3/02 to 8/7/02
TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 : TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 Participant requirements: A computer with Internet access Access to high school’s lab Valid e-mail address to assign user name and password
The Online Learning Environment: : The Online Learning Environment: Password-protected Asynchronous, no geographical boundaries <24-hour turnaround Modular approach to content Time chunking (5-day) E-mail interaction with participants Assignments via two systems: Online testing: MC/short answer E-mail attachments for longer or formatted work
TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 : TEACHING ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) CHEMISTRY Education X 394.12 UCLA EXTENSION
How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys : How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys Very preliminary UCLA Extension Response rate: 7 of 11 16 questions; opportunity for comments Demographics Instructor Course organization & execution Expectations About UCLA Extension Homegrown Response rate: 9 of 11 30 questions; opportunity for comments “Questions about you” “Questions about the instructors” “Questions about the course”
How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys : How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys Small sample size: comments most important 6. Why did you take this on-line course? Check all that apply. The instructor's reputation 1 Fit my time schedule 3 Reduces the need to travel to campus 4 Pace of course 1 The course was only offered on-line 6 I believe on-line courses are better quality than face-to-face courses I learn better in on-line courses Other reason 3 Students took course online for access, not quality UCLA Homegrown
How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys : How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys Participants perceived course as effective 10. Expectations. c.  The course fulfilled my career educational needs. 8.1/9 29. This course prepared you to teach AP Chemistry. 5 Agree strongly; 4 Agree; 0 Neutral; 0 Disagree; 0 Disagree strongly Both surveys suggest high satisfaction 12. Overall Evaluation of the Course. 7.3/9 30. Rate the overall quality of the course. 6 Excellent; 3 Good; 0 Fair; 0 Poor UCLA Homegrown BUT, participants found quality:
How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys : How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys Strengths 1.  Knowledge/Expertise. The instructor was knowledgeable about the material. 8.1/9 22. The academic quality was on par with face-to-face courses you've taken. 3 Agree strongly; 5 Agree; 0 Neutral; 1 Disagree; 0 Disagree strongly Conclude Website effective vehicle for instructors & content UCLA Homegrown
How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys : How did we do? - Satisfaction surveys Weaknesses 6.  Interaction. The instructor fostered active student participation. 6.3/9 “I would have liked more on-line discussions about the material. Was I the only one that was rusty on some of the topics? ….” “The content instruction was well presented.  I was hoping more for an exchange of ideas on how to teach this content.  Since I have taught this course for 3 years, I have a pretty firm grasp on the content, but am always looking for a new approach.” “I felt that the course was more geared towards teachers who have not yet taught AP Chemistry.” Conclude that we need more debate of approaches, discussion of problems and experiences, community building UCLA Homegrown
Online in Summer 2003 … : Online in Summer 2003 … Southeast Mo State, Jun. 9 to Jul. 14 http://cstl.semo.edu/aptd/ UCLA Extension, Jul. 10 to Aug. 14 http://www.uclaextension.org/ap Implement DropBox Guest Speaker – 2002 participant Substitute individual lesson plans for collaborative projects in Discussion Forums Add .pdf format
for further information … : for further information … Session Website: http://cstl-csm.semo.edu/APCHEM/ACS225th/ E-mail: Mike Rodgers: mrodgers@semo.edu Mike Readnour: mreadnour@semo.edu Thank you for your interest!
GI604 AP Institute: Chemistry : GI604 AP Institute: Chemistry Catalog description: An institute designed to prepare high school teachers to teach AP Chemistry in their schools and to review and reinforce basic concepts and principles in chemistry, including the structure of matter, state of matter, reactions, descriptive chemistry, and chemical calculations.  (3)
Let’s Look at the Course : Let’s Look at the Course GI604