Posts tagged ‘Moodle’

WizIQ plugin now available for Moodle 2.2!

WizIQ has offered a virtual classroom plugin for the Moodle Learning Management System since Moodle 1.9 was widely in use. We remain committed to the Moodle community since so many of our users turn to the free and open source LMS when they decide their organizations could benefit from such a system. Since then, we’ve rolled out plugins for Moodle 2.0 and 2.1. Today, we’re pleased to announce the availability of our plugin for Moodle 2.2, allowing users to add synchronous learning tools to the four most recent versions of the most popular open source LMS in the world.

Moodle users can simply fill out the online form here or contact sales@wiziq.com to download the new plugin (or plugins for versions 1.9 and 2.0/2.1) and begin a 30-day free trial of WizIQ right within their existing Moodle installation. Live demos of WizIQ in Moodle versions 1.9 and 2.0/2.1 are also available for users wishing to test the plugin in a public sandbox.

Existing WizIQ users can contact support@wiziq.com to talk about upgrading to the new plugin.

Additional resources for Moodle users interested in delivering live classes online can be found below (some resources require registration):

LMS (like my status) for LMS (learning management systems)

Education Technology, Research

January 17, 2012

“Virtual” classroom or “Virtually used LMS” classroom

Virtually every college and university in the United States uses a learning management system, or LMS. Whether they choose to use Blackboard, Moodle, Desire2Learn, or one of the many other options available, there isn’t one school that doesn’t use a LMS. And this isn’t a bad thing- Learning management system supply and pull together resources so that students know about their homework, can read up on future assignments, and can even complete some assignments online. All that is possible, under the assumption that the teacher is even using the LMS.

Notice I said that every school seems to have an LMS; I can say from experience that many teachers just don’t bother with them. I took 4 classes this last semester and only two of them used my university’s LMS of choice: Blackboard. In one class, I was forced to use Blackboard, because it was an online class. The other class where Blackboard was being used was Geometry. However, I never once used it other than to download the syllabus for the class. My school doesn’t really force the use of Blackboard; many of my friends go to schools that do. Unfortunately for schools, students, maybe even more than teachers, just aren’t using the LMS that is available.

 

But who can blame the Professors?          
   
In a setting where some teachers don’t even use the e-learning opportunities available to them, are students really expected to hop on the bandwagon as well? As a matter of fact, as I’m typing this, I got an e-mail from one of my professors next semester. He sent us an e-mail saying that we would be using a site called CourseKit for our upcoming semester as a complete replacement for Blackboard. The last line of his e-mail says: “Wander around a bit–it looks far better than anything Blackboard has to offer!”
Our university is paying for something that not even the teachers want to use! That sounds to me like it’s time to change.
When students use the Internet, they’re spending most of their time on social media, so why aren’t LMS companies using this to their advantage? Over the course of 2006-2008, Blackboard lost almost 20% of its total users. As of this year, they have lost closer to 25% from 2006. This is partly because of competition, but I would argue that, in many ways, the lonely LMS, no matter who makes it, is becoming unnecessary to higher education. I’ve made it through a whole semester and a half of college without using Blackboard in any meaningful way. I don’t mean to discredit learning management systems or e-learning in any way. It’s just that it feels like there should be a better way for students and teachers to work together online. I think that way is through Facebook.

Could Facebook be a better way!!

One might say, “Blackboard doesn’t need to be on Facebook, they already have an iPhone app!” Students use their phones for texting, looking up YouTube videos, posting on Facebook, and the occasional phone call home. But how many students are going to want to use LMS on their phones? For most of us, our phones are for social and entertainment purposes exclusively. Not learning. For me, I’ll log on to Blackboard maybe once a week. However, I’ll log onto Facebook every day and keep the tab open for the rest of the day. Maybe other average college students log on to their LMS more often than I do, but I would bet anything that they log onto Facebook more than that.

 

Think about this: an LMS app on Facebook. When students log on to Facebook, they click on the app, use their LMS for an hour and then get back onto posting on people’s timelines. The problem with technology today is that there seems to be a divide between entertainment and education. When a piece of technology is used for entertainment, it can’t come anywhere near anything that has to do with higher learning. This is ridiculous, because if the two were matched together, they’d be a perfect pair. Sure, students could still potentially get distracted by Facebook when they’re on this hypothetical app, but at least they would be learning at the same time. If my school’s LMS were actually part of Facebook, I might actually use it.

A longtime WizIQ user, but a new WizIQ blogger

Dr. Nellie Deutsch

I am a lifelong learner with a passion for sharing what I learn and collaborating with others in the process. I have always gone beyond the classroom as a student (K-12 – PhD) and as an English language teacher. Before the Internet was available, I spent hours in public libraries. Now, I search for information online through Google scholar and retrieve the articles (view, download, and print) from an online library at the University of Phoenix. But while I love to read, I need to share and reflect as I learn any time, any place and with other learners. The Internet has made learning so much easier. I can now, communicate with people from around the world and learn with and from them. I use social networks such as Facebook, twitter, linkedin, scribd, academia, and social bookmarking sites to keep track of my work and share it with others. But, this is not enough. Even though social networks provide real time communication such as chats, I need to be able to share and collaborate in a safe classroom environment. The  face-to-face class is limited by physical walls so I searched for a virtual class. My search began in the mid 90s. I tried every live virtual classroom around until I found WizIQ in 2007.

I have always loved virtual classes because they offer opportunities to connect with participants from around the world. The energy that develops in the room is unlike any I have experienced in face-to-face classes. People who come to a virtual class seem to be extremely attentive and motivated to learn. I had used many virtual classrooms in the past, but felt frustrated by the lack of timely support and care that I got from their support teams. I have faced many technical issues since I began my online adventure in the late 80s/early 90s. In 2007, I joined WizIQ after joining a class moderated by Mark Cruthers on the features of WizIQ. I was a doctoral student at the time and was busy with my studies and working at a full time job teaching English at a high school so I could help put 3 of our children through undergraduate schools. Yes, 4 of us were in college. My husband was working overseas in Turkey at the time so I had lots of time to spend online teaching and learning. The CEO and team at WizIQ made a huge impression on me because they were willing to listen to feedback and suggestions on how to improve the system. I was sold on the potential of WizIQ to be the world’s best virtual classroom and I was right. WizIQ is going to be a household name very very soon.

As a long-time user of WizIQ, I feel that it’s time I gave back to WizIQ. I will be a regular contributor to the blog. There is one problem: I need a name for the blog corner. I would appreciate your help in finding a suitable name for my posts.

Moodle resources – A larger conversation

Announcements, General

January 13, 2012

Last week, we published a white paper on “12 Moodle tools to interact with your students online“. Unfortunately, it wasn’t originally published under that title. Instead, we called it the “Moodle tool guide for teachers.” As they say, the best laid plans…

I edited the paper, as did a few others of us here at WizIQ, and I think it’s actually a pretty useful document. I’ve used Moodle a fair amount over the years (I’m no guru, by any means, but one of my New Year’s Resolutions is to dive much deeper into it and explore it both as a content management tool and a teaching/learning platform for several projects with which I’m involved), but somehow managed to miss the fact that one of the most shared and useful Moodle resources, created by Joyce Seitzinger in 2010, was also called the “Moodle Tool Guide for Teachers” (PDF). I’ve been writing about ed tech (and, for that matter, living, eating, and breathing it) for long enough that I shouldn’t have missed that.

Fortunately, as Ms. Seitzinger pointed out in a related blog post about the tool guide, the Moodle community quickly stepped up and called us out on the oversight. Special thanks to Nathan Cobb, among others, for bringing it to our attention.

This actually brings up the larger issue, though, of content, resources, and tools, as well as open resources vs. those with some cost. Ms. Seitzinger released her tool guide (which, by the way, is a really outstanding infographic for navigating the many features and uses of Moodle – if you haven’t seen it already, it’s well worth a look) under a Creative Commons license. To download our white paper, you need to provide us with a name and phone number and, chances are, you’ll get an email along the lines of “Hi there! We noticed that you downloaded our white paper on Moodle. Would you like to hear about a great virtual classroom plugin for the LMS?” The paper is free, but as in beer, not as in speech, and, just as free beer usually means you need to help a buddy move or go to a party about which you’re not all that excited, so is there a small, non-monetary cost to downloading our paper.

So why don’t we just release ours as an open resource? Believe me, we’ve talked about this a lot internally here at WizIQ. However, for a company like ours, not only do we need to actively seek out sales leads (heck, even IBM makes you give them an email address and take a survey to download white papers), but we need to build a community who understands how our product can add value in the classroom. Folks already involved with distance learning understand it pretty well and probably know the name WizIQ. Others who are just getting into e-learning and blended environments (the main audience for our Moodle paper) may very well not. So being able to email them, send them a newsletter describing innovative uses of WizIQ in a brick and mortar classroom, or even have an actual phone conversation with them has a lot of value for us, both monetarily and intangibly.

Ms. Seitzinger asks in her blog

I wonder if what we are seeing is evidence of companies with pre-21st century business practices. They don’t involve themselves in their field enough, to have an awareness of the existing community and its artifacts, yet blatantly try to interact with that community. Social media should make that easier, but unfortunately many companies and organisations still seem to be in broadcast mode.

I agree with her that it’s all too easy to crank out some content and try to use it to sell a product. In my work as a freelance writer, I’ve been paid handsomely to write just that sort of content. It didn’t keep me from cashing the check and I can still sleep pretty well at night, but it is a problem that savvy educators (or members of any other community) should be able to sniff out pretty easily.

That said, companies like WizIQ have to balance strategies for actually making money with much more genuine engagement. I hope we’re getting there. I’ve been an educator and educational technologist for many years; it’s why WizIQ hired me in the first place. And it’s why we have educators (and, more recently, students) working with us on the content we create and the ways in which we engage with educators. With that, though, comes the ability of the community to keep us honest. We’re going to try to keep giving you reasons to visit our site and read what we have to say, right at the same time as we keep building what we believe is the most cost-effective virtual classroom solution available. I look forward to more feedback (and writing lots more) in the months to come.